Samsung Ssd 850 Evo Vs 870 Evo: Which Is Better?
The Samsung SSD 870 EVO surpasses its predecessor, the 850 EVO, with enhanced performance and endurance.
Featuring faster read and write speeds, the 870 EVO delivers improved system responsiveness. In comparing these two SSDs, the 870 EVO emerges as the superior choice in terms of performance and endurance.
The advancements in technology and design contribute to faster data transfer rates, translating into quicker system responsiveness.
The 870 EVO generally exhibits a higher endurance rating, making it a robust solution for users engaging in data-intensive tasks, such as video editing or gaming.
While the 850 EVO may be a more budget-friendly choice, the 870 EVO’s advancements make it a compelling option for users seeking top-notch performance and durability.
Key Takeaway
Key Differences Between Samsung SSD 850 Evo And 870 Evo
The Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO were popular solid-state drives (SSDs) from Samsung, known for their reliability and performance.
Below is a table comparing the Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO:
Feature | Samsung SSD 850 EVO | Samsung SSD 870 EVO |
---|---|---|
Capacity Options | 120GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB |
Form Factor | 2.5-inch SATA III | 2.5-inch SATA III |
Interface | SATA III (6Gb/s) | SATA III (6Gb/s) |
Controller | Samsung MGX | Samsung MKX |
NAND Flash Memory | 3D V-NAND | 3D V-NAND |
Sequential Read Speed | Up to 540 MB/s | Up to 560 MB/s |
Sequential Write Speed | Up to 520 MB/s | Up to 530 MB/s |
Random Read Speed (4KB) | Up to 98,000 IOPS | Up to 98,000 IOPS |
Random Write Speed (4KB) | Up to 90,000 IOPS | Up to 88,000 IOPS |
MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) | 1.5 million hours | 1.5 million hours |
Endurance (TBW – Terabytes Written) | Varies by capacity | Varies by capacity |
Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
The Samsung 870 Evo brings moderate performance improvements but much better endurance ratings and newer NAND technology while maintaining the reliability of the 850 series. The 870 Evo is the better overall performer.
Performance Comparison
The performance of the Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO models are compared, highlighting their differences and capabilities. These two SSDs offer improved speed and storage options for a more efficient computing experience.
Sequential Read/Write Speeds:
- The Samsung SSD 850 EVO offers impressive sequential read speeds of up to 540 MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 520 MB/s.
- On the other hand, the Samsung SSD 870 EVO takes performance to the next level with sequential read speeds of up to 560 MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 530 MB/s.
- With faster sequential speeds, the 870 EVO delivers quicker data transfers, allowing for smoother multitasking and faster file transfers.
Random Read/Write Speeds:
- Both the Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO excel in random read and write speeds, which are crucial for everyday computing tasks.
- The 850 EVO offers random read speeds of up to 98,000 IOPS and random write speeds of up to 90,000 IOPS.
- The 870 EVO, however, surpasses its predecessor with random read speeds of up to 98,000 IOPS and random write speeds of up to 88,000 IOPS.
- These faster speeds provide improved responsiveness, making it ideal for demanding applications and gaming.
Endurance And Lifespan:
- When it comes to endurance and lifespan, both SSDs offer exceptional reliability and long-term performance.
- The Samsung SSD 850 EVO comes with a maximum endurance rating of up to 150 TBW (Terabytes Written), ensuring long-lasting usage.
- On the other hand, the Samsung SSD 870 EVO takes endurance to the next level, offering a maximum rating of up to 600 TBW.
- This increased endurance means that the 870 EVO can handle heavy workloads and intensive usage for a longer period of time, making it a reliable choice for professional users.
The Samsung SSD 870 EVO outperforms the 850 EVO in terms of sequential read/write speeds, random read/write speeds, and endurance.
With faster speeds and increased durability, the 870 EVO proves to be an excellent choice for users seeking top-notch performance and long-term reliability for their storage needs.
Design And Compatibility
The Samsung SSD 850 Evo and 870 Evo offer impressive design and compatibility. With their sleek and modern design, they seamlessly integrate into any system, while their high compatibility ensures smooth performance across a wide range of devices.
Let’s dive into these aspects and explore the similarities and differences between these two SSD models:
Form Factor And Dimensions
- Both the Samsung SSD 850 Evo and the 870 Evo follow the 2.5-inch form factor, making them compatible with most desktops and laptops.
- These SSDs are designed to fit into the standard 9.5mm drive bays, ensuring easy integration into various systems.
- The 2.5-inch form factor also allows for flexibility in terms of mounting options, whether using brackets or directly attaching the SSD to the chassis.
- The Samsung SSD 850 Evo measures 100 x 69.85 x 6.8mm, while the 870 Evo measures 100 x 69.85 x 6.8mm as well. This similarity in size ensures seamless replacement or upgrade without any physical constraints.
Interface Compatibility
- The Samsung SSD 850 Evo and the 870 Evo are both compatible with the SATA III interface, enabling fast and reliable data transfer.
- SATA III offers a maximum data transfer rate of 6Gb/s, which allows for quick access to files and faster boot times.
- These SSDs are backward compatible with SATA II and SATA I interfaces, giving users the flexibility to use them with older systems that have these interfaces.
- With their SATA III compatibility, the Samsung SSD 850 Evo and the 870 Evo can be easily installed and recognized by most modern motherboards and operating systems.
Installation And Setup Process
- Installing the Samsung SSD 850 Evo or the 870 Evo is a straightforward process. Simply connect the SATA cable to the SSD and the motherboard, and mount the drive in the desired location within the system chassis.
- Once physically installed, the SSD is detected by the system’s BIOS and can be initialized and formatted using the operating system’s disk management utilities.
- The Samsung Magician software, available for both SSD models, provides a user-friendly interface for managing the drive, including firmware updates, performance optimization, and secure erasure options.
- The setup process for these SSDs is hassle-free, allowing users to quickly upgrade their storage solution and experience improved system performance.
The Samsung SSD 850 Evo and the 870 Evo share similarities in terms of their form factor, interface compatibility, and installation process.
Upgrading to either of these models guarantees enhanced system performance and improved storage capabilities.
Price And Value For Money
The Samsung SSD 870 Evo offers improved performance and a better price-to-value ratio compared to its predecessor, the 850 Evo.
With faster data transfer speeds and enhanced durability, the 870 Evo provides excellent performance for the price.
Let’s dive into a price comparison, explore the cost per GB, and consider the warranty and customer support of these SSDs.
Price Comparison:
When comparing the prices of the Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO, it is important to consider whether the additional features in the latter justify the price difference.
Here’s an overview:
- The Samsung SSD 850 EVO is often available at a lower price point compared to its successor, the 870 EVO. This makes it a more budget-friendly option for those seeking reliable SSD performance.
- On the other hand, the Samsung SSD 870 EVO might come at a slightly higher price tag. However, it offers enhanced technology, which includes improved performance and durability. This could make it a worthwhile investment for individuals seeking cutting-edge features.
Cost Per Gb:
Calculating the cost per GB is an essential aspect of determining the value for money in any solid-state drive.
Here’s what you need to know about the cost per GB of the Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO:
- The Samsung SSD 850 EVO typically provides a cost-efficient storage solution, as it offers a competitive cost per GB ratio. This makes it a great choice for those who prioritize affordability without compromising performance.
- With the Samsung SSD 870 EVO, you can expect a slightly higher cost per GB compared to its predecessor. However, this is primarily due to the advanced features offered by this model, such as improved read and write speeds. Therefore, if faster performance is a priority, the increased cost per GB might be justifiable.
Warranty And Customer Support:
Having reliable warranty coverage and access to excellent customer support is essential when investing in a solid-state drive.
Here’s what you need to know about the warranty and customer support provided by Samsung for these SSDs:
- Samsung offers a five-year limited warranty for both the Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO. This warranty period provides peace of mind, ensuring that you are covered in case of any unexpected issues.
- In terms of customer support, Samsung has a reputation for providing prompt and efficient assistance. Their support teams are readily available to address any concerns or queries you may have, ensuring a smooth experience throughout your SSD usage.
Considering both the warranty and customer support aspects, opting for either the Samsung SSD 850 EVO or 870 EVO ensures you receive quality assurance and reliable assistance should the need arise.
When comparing the price and value for money of the Samsung SSD 850 EVO and 870 EVO, it’s essential to consider the benefits of each model.
Conclusion
The Samsung SSD 850 Evo and 870 Evo are both exceptional options for upgrading your storage drive. The 870 Evo offers improved performance and reliability, making it a great choice for those seeking top-notch speed and durability.
With its advanced V-NAND technology and robust controller, the 870 Evo ensures seamless multitasking and faster data transfers.
On the other hand, the 850 Evo still holds its ground as a reliable and cost-effective option, suitable for average users looking to improve their system’s performance. The decision between the two boils down to personal needs and budget.